← ALL SERVICES / 05

AI-powered tooling & automation.

AI features that survive contact with production — with evaluation, fallbacks, and cost control designed in, not bolted on.

PythonDjangoScrapyWebSocketsDockerPostgreSQL
Overview

The gap between an AI demo and an AI feature is everything that happens when the model is wrong: evaluation, fallbacks, human review paths, and cost ceilings. This service builds AI capabilities into real products — automation pipelines, LLM-backed workflows, intelligent crawlers — with that unglamorous machinery included.

I built GhostAI, an AI crawler that parses DOMs and auto-generates test cases for a QA platform, and I architect the backend of an AI-powered telephonic enrollment platform handling US healthcare-assistance workflows. Both taught the same lesson: the model is 20% of the work, and the honest feasibility call up front is worth more than either.

What's included

Scope of the service

Feasibility scopingA timeboxed, evidence-based answer to 'can AI actually do this?' — on your data, before you commit a budget to it.
  • ▸Spike against your real data with an accuracy target agreed up front
  • ▸Approach comparison: LLM vs rules vs hybrid, with cost per unit at volume
  • ▸A written go/no-go recommendation — including 'no'
DELIVERABLEFeasibility report with real numbers, in one to two weeks.
LLM & model integrationModel calls wired into your existing backend with prompt management, structured outputs, and versioning — not a notebook in production.
  • ▸Structured outputs with schema validation on every model response
  • ▸Prompts versioned, tested, and reviewed like code
  • ▸Provider abstraction so you can switch models without a rewrite
DELIVERABLEA production integration, not a notebook.
Automation pipelinesCrawling, DOM parsing, extraction, and generation workflows built on Scrapy, Celery, and WebSockets for real-time feedback.
  • ▸Crawling and DOM parsing with throttling and per-source failure isolation
  • ▸Extraction and generation workflows on Celery with retries
  • ▸Real-time progress over WebSockets for long-running jobs
DELIVERABLEPipelines processing your real workload on staging.
Evaluation & fallbacksAccuracy measured against a golden set; defined behavior for low-confidence outputs — human review, graceful degradation, or refusal.
  • ▸Golden evaluation set built from real cases, run in CI on every change
  • ▸Confidence thresholds with defined behavior below them
  • ▸Human-in-the-loop review queue where the stakes require it
DELIVERABLEAn eval harness — the difference between impressive and dependable.
Cost & latency controlCaching, batching, and model-tier routing so the unit economics still work at 100x volume.
  • ▸Caching and batching for repeated or bulk operations
  • ▸Model-tier routing: cheap models for easy cases, expensive ones only when needed
  • ▸Hard cost ceilings with alerts before the bill surprises you
DELIVERABLEUnit economics that survive 100x volume, documented.
Monitoring for driftDashboards tracking output quality over time — AI features degrade silently; yours will tell you.
  • ▸Output-quality dashboards tracking accuracy against the golden set over time
  • ▸Alerts when quality or cost drifts past thresholds
  • ▸User feedback captured and wired back into the eval set
DELIVERABLEA feature that tells you it's degrading — before your users do.
How it runs

Phases specific to this service

These slot into the standard engagement process — discovery, requirement analysis, and a written proposal always come first.

1

Feasibility spike

1–2 weeks, timeboxed

A narrow prototype against your real data with a measurable target. Ends with numbers and a go/no-go — including 'no', which costs you two weeks instead of two quarters.

2

Prototype to pilot

2–4 weeks

The winning approach is built into a pilot with real users in the loop, capturing corrections that become the evaluation set.

3

Productionize

Weekly cycles

Evals in CI, fallback paths, rate and cost limits, and monitoring — the feature graduates from 'impressive' to 'dependable'.

4

Measure & iterate

Ongoing

Output quality tracked against the golden set; prompts and models updated on evidence, not vibes.

Proof

Where I've done this before

Shipped work this service is based on — details on the projects page.

Architect
GhostAI — AI test-case generationAI crawler that parses application DOMs and auto-generates test cases for a QA automation SaaS.
Backend Architect
Social Benefits Enrollment PlatformBackend of an AI-powered telephonic platform for Medicaid / SNAP / healthcare-assistance enrollment.
ALL PROJECTS →
Fit

Is this the right service?

GOOD FIT IF
  • ▸A workflow eats hours of repetitive human effort on text, documents, or web data
  • ▸You want an AI feature but need an honest feasibility answer first
  • ▸You have an AI demo that works — and no path to production
NOT A FIT IF
  • ·You want to train foundation models — I integrate and productionize, I don't do ML research
  • ·The AI is for the press release, not the product

ENGAGEMENT · Starts with the timeboxed feasibility spike as a small fixed-scope engagement; production build follows as a project or embedded work.

Other services
Contact

Sound like your problem?

Send a short description of what you're building and where it hurts. Discovery call is free; written proposal within a week of requirement analysis.

[email protected] · +91 79862 35112